A
with Index Finger Inserted in B’s Anus
by James Swingle
|
|
A: What issues does this raise?      
B: It’s uncomfortable, though not painful.
A: Discomfort is not an issue.
B: You are the one in the position to determine the
issues.    I am reduced to sensation.
A: Reduced?
A: What issues does this raise?
B: The fact that your index finger is inserted into
my        anus?
A: Yes.
B: My consent or lack of it in this act is the primary
        issue.
A: For you, perhaps. For me it is only an issue if
I choose    to admit it.
B: Are you a police officer?
B: Is this some kind of examination?
A: If I say yes, does that change your experience of
the      act?
B: I associate examinations with medicine. In the context
     of medicine, immediate discomfort can be seen as a
        necessary consequence of the long term health
benefits      of an action.
A: What if I say yes, this is an examination, but not
for      medical reasons?
B: Then I am the subject of an experiment?
A: Perhaps.
B: Does this give you pleasure?
A: Once again, if I say yes, does that change your
           experience of the act?
B: If I am the subject of an experiment that gives
me         discomfort, and you are enjoying it,
I’ll be angry.
A: What if we are both the subject of an experiment?
B: Are we having sex?
B: You are removed from the act you commit.
A: How so?
B: The nerve endings in my anus convey the commission
of      the act more forcibly than the nerve endings in
your      index finger. For you, this becomes an intellectual
act    more than a physical one. I am, however, rooted in the
     physical.
A: So the power of my intellectual act is to root you
in      the very physicalness of a situation I am free to
rise    above.
B: Like a tenant, denied heat and hot water, is constantly
   made aware of a physical reality that a landlord who  
   merely faces a business dilemma escapes.
A: So oppression is the act of making your intellectual
     decision someone else’s physical reality.
B: More precisely, the oppressor plays out on an  
            intellectual battleground
the conflicts the oppressed      plays out on a physical
battleground. Oppression occurs    when one can define another’s
reality as an intellectual    problem.
A: I can experience my index finger in your anus as
a         purely intellectual issue, while it is
an inescapable      physical reality for you.
B: Do you represent the government?
A: I am going to begin to move my index finger back
and       forth within your anus. Does this change anything?
B: I had grown accustomed to the sensation of your
finger      in my anus, and it therefore occupied my consciousness
     less directly than it had originally. It is now brought
   back to the forefront of my consciousness.
A: Do you enjoy the sensation?
B: No. Has my enjoyment become an issue?
A: Must something be an issue to be admitted into  
         discourse? Can’t I acknowledge
your sensation without      giving it the status of issue?
B: No.
A: You said initially you were reduced to sensation.
I was    the one in the position to determine what the issues
     were.
B: I was wrong. That is what you want me to believe.
You      can put your index finger in my anus through an
act of      power. You cannot likewise control discourse.
Discourse    is whatever is said, but also whatever thoughts
are         planted in the minds of listeners even
if not directly      spoken. Your control over discourse
is limited to what      you say, and what you can cause
others not to say. You      cannot control the unspoken
interpretations.
A: Have you just proven the theoretical impossibility
of      tyranny? I would say there is empirical evidence
to the    contrary.
B: Obviously it has existed. Unspoken interpretations
need    a spoken catalyst to foment revolution. But information
   moves quickly, it is easier to bring the catalyst into  
   contact with the unspoken interpretations.
A: So this ultimately leads to revolution?
B: Yes.
A: What if a listener were to suspect you enjoyed the
        sensation of my index finger in your anus?
A: Have we achieved intimacy?
B: We are bound together psychologically as well as
           physically. I would not call
it intimacy.
A: Nor would I.
A: I am removing my index finger from your anus.
B: No. It can’t end like this.
A: It is over.
B: I must destroy you.