A with Index Finger Inserted in B’s Anus
by James Swingle

 


A: What issues does this raise?      
B: It’s uncomfortable, though not painful.
A: Discomfort is not an issue.
B: You are the one in the position to determine the issues.    I am reduced to sensation.
A: Reduced?

A: What issues does this raise?
B: The fact that your index finger is inserted into my        anus?
A: Yes.
B: My consent or lack of it in this act is the primary         issue.
A: For you, perhaps. For me it is only an issue if I choose    to admit it.
B: Are you a police officer?


B: Is this some kind of examination?
A: If I say yes, does that change your experience of the      act?
B: I associate examinations with medicine. In the context      of medicine, immediate discomfort can be seen as a         necessary consequence of the long term health benefits      of an action.
A: What if I say yes, this is an examination, but not for      medical reasons?
B: Then I am the subject of an experiment?
A: Perhaps.
B: Does this give you pleasure?
A: Once again, if I say yes, does that change your            experience of the act?
B: If I am the subject of an experiment that gives me         discomfort, and you are enjoying it, I’ll be angry.
A: What if we are both the subject of an experiment?


B: Are we having sex?


B: You are removed from the act you commit.
A: How so?
B: The nerve endings in my anus convey the commission of      the act more forcibly than the nerve endings in your      index finger. For you, this becomes an intellectual act    more than a physical one. I am, however, rooted in the      physical.
A: So the power of my intellectual act is to root you in      the very physicalness of a situation I am free to rise    above.
B: Like a tenant, denied heat and hot water, is constantly    made aware of a physical reality that a landlord who      merely faces a business dilemma escapes.
A: So oppression is the act of making your intellectual      decision someone else’s physical reality.
B: More precisely, the oppressor plays out on an               intellectual battleground the conflicts the oppressed      plays out on a physical battleground. Oppression occurs    when one can define another’s reality as an intellectual    problem.
A: I can experience my index finger in your anus as a         purely intellectual issue, while it is an inescapable      physical reality for you.
B: Do you represent the government?


A: I am going to begin to move my index finger back and       forth within your anus. Does this change anything?
B: I had grown accustomed to the sensation of your finger      in my anus, and it therefore occupied my consciousness      less directly than it had originally. It is now brought    back to the forefront of my consciousness.
A: Do you enjoy the sensation?
B: No. Has my enjoyment become an issue?
A: Must something be an issue to be admitted into            discourse? Can’t I acknowledge your sensation without      giving it the status of issue?
B: No.
A: You said initially you were reduced to sensation. I was    the one in the position to determine what the issues      were.
B: I was wrong. That is what you want me to believe. You      can put your index finger in my anus through an act of      power. You cannot likewise control discourse. Discourse    is whatever is said, but also whatever thoughts are         planted in the minds of listeners even if not directly      spoken. Your control over discourse is limited to what      you say, and what you can cause others not to say. You      cannot control the unspoken interpretations.
A: Have you just proven the theoretical impossibility of      tyranny? I would say there is empirical evidence to the    contrary.
B: Obviously it has existed. Unspoken interpretations need    a spoken catalyst to foment revolution. But information    moves quickly, it is easier to bring the catalyst into      contact with the unspoken interpretations.
A: So this ultimately leads to revolution?
B: Yes.
A: What if a listener were to suspect you enjoyed the         sensation of my index finger in your anus?


A: Have we achieved intimacy?
B: We are bound together psychologically as well as            physically. I would not call it intimacy.
A: Nor would I.

A: I am removing my index finger from your anus.
B: No. It can’t end like this.
A: It is over.
B: I must destroy you.

 

back